"Esta web utiliza cookies para facilitar la navegación por ella y para realizar análisis de su uso, incluida la elaboración de perfiles de navegación con fines publicitarios. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su instalación. Para obtener información detallada sobre las cookies que utilizamos, incluyendo cómo configurar su navegador para rechazarlas, pulse aquí."

restauración

ficha técnica

POLITICA
A SKEPTIC'S CASE FOR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT
A SKEPTIC'S CASE FOR NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT
2013
978-0-8157-2543-5
ENGLISH
añadir a favoritos

sinopsis

In 2007 two former U.S. secretaries of state, a defense secretary, and a former senator wrote persuasively in the Wall Street Journal that the time had come to move seriously toward a nuclear-free world. Almost two years later, the Global Zero movement was born with its chief aim to rid the world of such weapons once and for all by 2030. But is it realistic or even wise to envision a world without nuclear weapons? More and more people seem to think so. Barack Obama has declared "America's commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons." But that is easier said than done. Michael O'Hanlon places his own indelible stamp on this critical issue, putting forth a "friendly skeptic's case for nuclear disarmament." Calls to "ban the bomb" are as old as the bomb itself, but the pace and organization of nonproliferation campaigns have picked up greatly recently. The growing Global Zero movement, for example, wants treaty negotiations to begin in 2019. Would this be prudent or even feasible in a world that remains dangerous, divided, and unpredictable? After all, America's nuclear arsenal has been its military trump card for much of the period since World War II...


*Todos nuestros productos incluyen el IVA, ampliar información


comentarios de los usuarios/usuarias